Saturday, September 17, 2011

Meat industry parallels to software testing

Govt. to expand E. coli tests in meat - Meat industry says added testing too expensive

Notice the parallels to software "checking".

Cost:  The meat industry immediately opposed the move, saying it is too expensive to do the tests and there isn't enough benefit.
Prevention versus detection:  "USDA will spend millions of dollars testing for these strains instead of using those limited resources toward preventive strategies that are far more effective in ensuring food safety,"
 Problem Severity: "People get kidney failure, people die, people have long-term complications. The number the bug has isn't really relevant."
 Expanding customer expectations:  At least one consumer advocacy group said it wants the department to go even further.
Do you find that your software testing/checking faces similar pressures as the meat industry?
How do you react to those pressures?
If the E. coli bugs were software bugs, how would you react?

2 comments:

  1. I'd make my SW Dev's eat their own dog food.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, probably our entry may be off topic but anyways, I have been surfing around your blog and it looks

    very professional. It’s obvious you know your topic and you appear fervent about it. I’m developing a

    fresh blog plus I’m struggling to make it look good, as well as offer the best quality content. I have

    learned much at your web site and also I anticipate alot more articles and will be coming back soon.

    Thanks you.

    <a href="http://www.isolve.co.in/Compliance Software</a>

    ReplyDelete